# Introduction

A replaceable tip is attached (typically a threaded connection) near the output end of a resonator. It may be useful in the following circumstances —

• Prototyping. In plastic spot welding or staking, the optimum contour of the horn face may not be known. Then prototype tips with different contours can be tried without the need to machine an entire custom horn.
• Wear. A horn's face will wear or deform due to abrasion, cavitation, or impact. This wear causes frequency, amplitude, and application problems (see below). A solid one-piece horn would be expensive to replace after such wear. Instead, expendable tips may be used (see figures 1). However, if reliability is a high priority (e.g., for high volume applications, especially where downtime should be avoided) then a custom solid horn may prove more satisfactory. Then the horn's output surface could be coated with chrome, carbide, or titanium nitride for improved wear resistance (although these may not be successful against cavitation erosion).
 Figure 1a. Liquid processing horn with replaceable tip
 Figure 1b. Replaceable tip

# Limitations

## Materials

Dukane[2], p. 63 — "It is important to note that both the replaceable tips and the threaded horns must be made of titanium. No other materials should be used." The reason for this restriction is unclear since it seems reasonable that horns and tips could also be made of steel. Also, the effect of intermixing materials (e.g., a titanium horn with a steel tip) is unclear but another report (unknown source) states, "Tip and tool should not be of the same alloy, or there is a tendency for galling to occur." It should be noted that steel tips are routinely used with titanium metal welding horns, although the tip is secured with a nut rather than being threaded into the horn (figure 2). (See metal welding tips.)

 Figure 2. Branson Ultrasonics metal welding horn (Holze patent 3,813,006)

### Cavitation erosion

If cavication erosion is a problem then see here.

## Weight and amplitude

Tips have limits on weight and amplitude in order to limit the inertial forces on the threads and tip-horn joint. The maximum tip diameter is typically limited to about Ø25 mm at 20 kHz. The smallest tips allow the highest amplitudes.

 Table 1. Standard 20 kHz flat-faced tips
Tip dia (mm) Thread Mass (g) Torque (Nm) Max. amplitude
(microns_peak)
Source
1/4-20   10.2   Branson
12.7 1/4-28   27.1   Dukane
1/4-28 3.5 ±0.2 12.4   Branson
60 Qsonica
5/16-24   33.9   Dukane
15.8 5/16-24 5.0 ±0.3     Branson
19.0 3/8-24   38.0   Dukane
3/8-24 8.5 ±0.5 20.3   Branson
30 Qsonica
22.2 7/16-20 12.5 ±0.6     Branson
25.4 1/2-20   40.7   Dukane
1/2-20 18.0 ±0.7     Branson
15 Qsonica
All ——— ——— 34 - 47   Sonics & Materials

Table notes —

1. The mass and maximum amplitude are for flat-faced tips. However, other tips (e.g., staking, spot welding) should also probably conform.
1. The mass includes the threaded shank.
2. The maximum amplitude may be determined by the input amplitude to the horn and the horn's gain rather than by performance requirements (tip heating, tip or horn fatigue, joint galling, etc.).
2. References —
1. Branson —
1. Mass — Branson[7] (p. 24)
2. Torques — Branson[3] (p. 2)
2. Dukane
3. Qsonica[1] (p. 1)
4. Sonics & Materials[2] (p. 13)

## Use with organic solvents or low surface tension liquids

There seems to be a consensus that a replaceable tip should not be used if it will be submerged in organic solvents or low surface tension liquids. For example, Sonics & Materials[3] (p. 2) says, "Organic solvents (e.g., methylene chloride) or low surface tension liquids will penetrate the interface between the probe and the replaceable tip, thus carrying the particulates into the threaded section and isolating the tip from the probe. When processing samples containing organic solvents or low surface tension liquids, ALWAYS use a solid probe. NEVER use a probe with a replaceable tip." Instead, the tip can be replaced by a half-wave or full-wave extension horn or a solid horn can be used.

Berliner Ultrasonics suggests that the problem with certain solvents is that they tend to wick under the tip-horn interface, thereby leading to cavitation erosion or wear by particulates in the fluid. Wicking supposedly occurs because the inertial forces on the tip during the contraction portion of the horn's stroke cause a small gap to open at the periphery of the tip-horn interface (i.e., the tip "flaps") whereby the fluid and particulates can enter. The problem is reportedly greater for large diameter tips.

One possible solution is to provide a shallow relief in either the horn or tip at the interface so that contact occurs only at a small ring at the periphery of the tip-horn interface. This has two benefits —

1. Because the interface contact area is reduced, a given tightening torque would increase the contact pressure.
2. With contact only at the interface periphery, flapping would be essentially eliminated.

Also, Culp[0] has successfully used an O-ring at the horn-tip joint for cavitation erosion tests in molten solder. This approach might also be successful for organic solvents and low surface tension liquids.

# Renewing replaceable tips

After significant wear has occurred, replaceable tips can sometimes be renewed by resurfacing the eroded surfaces. The following should be considered.

1. Frequency. When the eroded material is removed, the frequency of the ultrasonic stack will increase. Ultrasonic power supplies (generators) typically have a frequency band within which they will operate properly. This will depend on the design of the power supply. However, this frequency band is typically at least $$\pm$$1% of the nominal operating frequency (e.g., $$\pm$$200 Hz at 20 kHz) or more. The equipment manufacturer can provide the exact specification although the equipment may even operate properly outside the specified band. The tip can be repeatedly resurfaced until the frequency falls outside this band at which point the power supply should no longer start due to its internal protection circuitry.
2. Amplitude. As the frequency increases the output amplitude may change. If the amplitude is critical then it should be measured with a new tip to establish a reference. Then when the renewed tip is installed the amplitude should be adjusted via the power supply to get the reference amplitude. These measurements can be taken in air.
3. Heating. A new tip should be able to run for some time (say 30 seconds) in air without appreciable heating of the tip. If a renewed tip produces appreciable heating then this means that too much material has been removed so the stiffness across the tip's surface is not adequate to support the tightening load. Then the renewed tip should be discarded.

To provide for extra wear, tips can initially be machined somewhat longer than normal. The frequency will then be below nominal (for instance 19.8 kHz instead of 20 kHz). However, the added weight will put additional stress on the tip-horn joint so this method should be avoided if any extra heating occurs at this joint.

## Procedure (cavitation erosion)

Flat-faced tips should be renewed before excessive cavitation erosion occurs. Sonics & Materials (p. 16) recommends that the tip should be inspected for cavitation erosion every five to six hours and polished if necessary. Of course, this inspection/polishing interval will depend on the particular circumstances.

# Assembly

## Lubricants

Dukane[1] (p. 11) recommends —

• Apply a thin layer of Dow-Corning #4 high temperature, high pressure silicone grease (or #111 as an alternative) at the surface of the tip that mates to the horn.
• If a silicone-based grease can't be used then a petroleum-based grease can be used. However, it may leave carbonaceous deposits on the surface and require more frequent joint maintenance.
• Don't apply any grease to the tip threads.

If the tip will come in contact with food products then the lubricant must be approved. In this case, a solid horn may be preferable to a horn with a replaceable tip.

## Tightening torques

For the same tip, table 1 shows that Dukane recommends significantly higher tightening torques than Branson does. The reasons are not known.